Breaking away from the restraints of the metaphor

I have been throwing this word around for the past week without doing any justice to the clarity of its meaning, so much so that i have been thought to be speaking greek (which by the by I started learning from a friend yesterday)
When Milann and I were studying film at the National Institute of Design,we decided one day to wake up at 5am and go out for a field recording.So we smuggled a Tascam and mike out of the institute and reached the railway station, convinced that it was the only place that could provide equity to our first field recording.
And then the discoveries were spell binding.
Often times, in my experience, I have found that the sudden appearance of a visual image or sound, which has its emergence out of context, leaves me baffled to the extent that I have to pick up that camera and shoot or catch that sound somehow. Maybe hold onto that particular body language of a person by means of a still photograph.

So as such there is a nature-culture binary code in place, through which one can find certain unintentional structures, that can be paradoxically fabricated to some extent. Point being to bring about a blurring of the edges of your own aesthetics. Sharawadgi can be understood as a contrast from the very banality it is based on. It belongs to the sounds of everyday life. It will come only by a conscious deconstruction of contexts. By breaking away from the true meaning. It is the actualization of an impossible potentiality.

So the new imagination or the transported imagination once you find it, becomes a way by which one accesses the unlimited. To simplify, it is to challenge the imagination or the transported imagination, every time you get an interesting visual or sound idea, and you play around with the possibilities, so that you realize the potential it could accomplish within that medium or even without.

For instance, once the shot is taken, it would be interesting to analyze what triggered the thought process in the first place.Was it conceived before or after the shot, if so were there other elements that came into focus while one was taking the shot.It could also be that everything fell into place once the shot was taken.That would be one way of looking at it.
The other would be to question the medium itself.So I am sitting at a restaurant, or better still I am on a shoot, watching people work. This is the one time, people are off their guard, working seamlessly towards a common goal., And I pick out this one guy whose body language is of particular interest to me. Our resident photographer is busy, involved in her own thought process, taking photographs of the shoot and the crew and whatever else that strikes her mind.
I am excited to know how those photo-narratives will turn out.At the same time, I wonder if it was really that essential to capture that body language through the means of the photograph.Perhaps I could apply another medium here.My first thought was a charcoal drawing.Or maybe I could sketch him on the back pages of my notebook.Or better still, put him in a film. Now how would I evoke his body language in a film?